06/17/2019 / By Ethan Huff
It’s not every day that a high-profile individual decides to break from the herd and express unpopular viewpoints that could negatively impact her career. But that’s exactly what actress Jessica Biel has done by boldly joining up with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to challenge restrictive new legislation recently proposed in California that would make it even harder for parents to opt their children out of mandatory vaccinations.
On his Instagram account, Kennedy recently shared a series of photos of himself and Biel in Sacramento, where the two spoke with legislators about the threat of Senate Bill 276. Introduced by none other than corrupt drug and vaccine hack Richard Pan, SB 276 would require that all written statements by physicians allowing vaccination exemptions also be signed by an official from the State Department of Public Health.
This added hurdle would make it more difficult than ever for California parents to exempt their children from mandatory vaccinations for medical purposes, since that’s now the only exemption option afforded to parents in the Golden State. Prior to Pan’s legislative crusade against health freedom, California parents could freely exempt their children from mandatory vaccinations on not just medical grounds, but also for religious, personal and philosophical reasons.
“Please say thank you to the courageous [Jessica Biel] for a busy and productive day at the California State House,” Kennedy wrote in the caption below the photo series he shared to his Instagram account.
As to be expected, the pharma brigade has been quick to condemn Biel simply for standing up in defense of health freedom. Dr. Jennifer Gunter, a California gynecologist, jumped on her Twitter account after hearing the news to accuse Biel of coming out “as pro childhood death,” arguing that California children will some how die “from measles and influenza” if Pan and his fellow vaccine apologists don’t get their way in imposing more nanny state restrictions on medical exemptions for vaccines.
“Apparently she and her husband Justin Timberlake will be bringing measles back,” tweeted author and journalist Jennifer Wright, who also became triggered by Biel’s brave and selfless decision to support health freedom.
Fox News, which remains staunchly pro-vaccine and anti-freedom, similarly took a jab at both Kennedy and Biel, suggesting that the duo has taken an “anti-vaccination” stance by trying to protect California parents against having their children forcibly vaccinated by the medical police state.
“Sad to see Fox continuing to kowtow to the Liberal Left and insult our intelligence with below the belt terms like ‘Anti-Vaxxer’ slipped into their headlines,” wrote one Fox News commenter in response to the faux-conservative news outlet’s obvious bias against Kennedy and Biel, and their pro-freedom stance.
“Funny how many people think vaccines are the answer to everything … Big Pharma has done some great marketing,” wrote another commenter, expressing similar sentiments. “Clean water, good hygiene, proper nutrition, an understanding of waste disposal, etc., have been just as important to the eradication of disease as anything.”
These are some good points, as is the fact that the MMR vaccine for measles, mumps, and rubella is far more dangerous than contracting natural measles, which back in the day was looked at as being much like chicken pox – in other words, measles is no big deal.
For more real news about the deadly nature of vaccines, most of which are completely ineffective, be sure to check out Vaccines.news.
You can also learn more about how to naturally boost your immune system without the need for vaccines at NaturalMedicine.news.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
celebrities, children health defense, deception, exemptions, freedom, health freedom, hollywood, honest, Jessica Biel, legislation, Liberty, liberty celebrity, lies, measles, medical freedom, MMR, nanny state, police state, richard pan, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., SB 276, truth, Tyranny, vaccination, vaccines
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author