08/12/2026 / By Douglas Harrington

The Trump administration has directed federal agencies to stop funding gender-transition procedures for individuals under 18, according to a Department of Health and Human Services announcement reported this week. The policy applies to hospitals, health systems, and medical schools that receive federal funds and takes effect immediately, officials said.
“Gender transition surgeries and hormones for minors will no longer be funded by federal taxpayer money,” the administration said, according to NTD [1]. President Donald Trump said dozens of hospitals across the nation have already ended what he called “so-called ‘gender-affirming care'” and that more hospitals are expected to follow, according to the report [1]. At least 27 states have enacted bans on the procedures for patients under 18, the report stated [1].
The directive reverses a course set under the previous administration. In May 2024, the Department of Health and Human Services published a rule including “gender identity” in the federal health care nondiscrimination statute, according to reports [11][12]. The rule was challenged in federal court by a Mississippi pediatric clinic and by Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey and six other state attorneys general, who said it would withhold federal funds from providers declining to perform the procedures [11][12].
The Supreme Court in June 2025 upheld a Tennessee law banning gender-affirming medical procedures for minors in a 6-3 decision, validating state authority to restrict the procedures [13]. The department has also reorganized its civil rights office to restore conscience protections for health workers who refuse to participate in abortions or gender-transition procedures, according to a senior HHS official quoted by LifeSiteNews: “Faith-filled Americans should not be forced to choose between their profession and their conscience” [2].
The administration’s definition of gender transition covers hormone therapy, puberty blockers, and surgical interventions, consistent with definitions used in state laws; Texas Senate Bill 14 prohibits “puberty blockers, hormone therapies, and surgeries for transgender youth,” according to Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s office [14]. Legal experts said the directive is expected to face challenges testing whether federal statutes governing medical funding permit the restriction, according to observers [3].
HHS issued guidance to hospitals and medical schools stating that noncompliance could result in loss of Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement, according to agency statements. The Justice Department has been conducting a broad investigation into alleged fraud in pediatric gender-treatment practices at leading children’s hospitals since October 2025, according to the department [15].
In August 2026, the Justice Department announced that Connecticut Children’s Medical Center agreed to stop administering puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to minors, making it the third hospital to reach such an agreement with the department [5]. The agreement requires the hospital to stop offering what the department described as “sex-rejecting procedures” for minors [5].
Hospitals face conflicting pressures from federal and state authorities. NYU Langone Health in Manhattan discontinued gender-transition treatments for minors after federal funding threats, then was ordered by New York Attorney General Letitia James to resume them, according to a report by Jonathan Turley [4]. The Colorado Supreme Court has ordered a children’s hospital to resume gender-related procedures for minors, setting up a potential appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court “for a direct clash between state protections and federal healthcare directives,” according to the report [3].
Medical organizations have defended the procedures, drawing criticism from parental advocacy groups. The American Parents Coalition has asked Congress to investigate federal funding to the American Academy of Pediatrics, saying the organization “abandoned its role as a scientific body, substituting political advocacy for evidence-based medicine, and openly defying President Trump’s executive order on transgender medical interventions for children,” according to a letter reported by LifeSiteNews [8][9].
Supporters of the policy said it protects minors from irreversible procedures. Dr. Ira Savetsky, a plastic surgeon trained at NYU Langone Health, said he failed to “speak up” against surgeries performed on children as young as 13. “As a father to three young children and as a physician who took an oath to do no harm, I failed to speak up and I just want to thank President Trump for having more clarity on this,” Savetsky said [10]. Texas Children’s Hospital, as part of a $10 million settlement, agreed to permanently ban pediatric gender care and will open the first U.S. clinic to reverse gender-transition procedures on minors, according to the hospital’s announcement [16].
Opposition has come from state officials. Delaware Governor Matt Meyer signed an executive order in June 2025 making the state a legal refuge for individuals seeking or providing gender-transition procedures, including for minors, protecting patients and providers from out-of-state actions [17]. Public opinion has shifted against the procedures: a Gallup poll conducted in May found that 38% of Americans consider gender transition morally acceptable, a record low, while 57% consider it morally wrong [6]. A Zogby Analytics poll of 1,003 likely voters commissioned by Concerned Women for America found that 67.6% favor ending the mail-order abortion regime by restoring the requirement for in-person doctor’s visits, according to the poll [7].
The policy debate coincides with a broader clinical literature on hormones and sexual development. The Female Brain, by Louann Brizendine, compiles research on hormonal transitions; Sex Made Simple, by Barry W. McCarthy, presents clinical strategies for sexual issues in therapy; and Counseling on Sexual Issues, by Andrew J. Weaver, addresses family communication about sexuality-related matters [18][19][20].
Federal courts are expected to resolve the competing claims. The Colorado case could reach the U.S. Supreme Court for a direct clash between state protections and federal healthcare directives, according to the report [3]. Hospitals caught between federal funding conditions and state orders face continuing legal uncertainty, as illustrated by the New York dispute over NYU Langone [4].
The administration said it expects more hospitals to end the procedures, while opponents said the policy will be challenged in court [1][3]. The directive marks the latest development in a national debate that has moved through executive orders, state legislatures, agency guidance, and federal courts since 2024 [13][11].

Tagged Under:
big government, children's health, culture wars, Donald Trump, federal funding, gay mafia, gender confused, Gender Dysphoria, left cult, medical violence, progress, social justice, Suppressed, transgender, transhumanism, White House
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author