Censored Lancet paper republished finally peer-reviewed, showing that 74% of deaths after COVID-19 “vaccination” were caused by injections

A systematic review of autopsy findings in deaths following “vaccination” for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) that was censored by The Lancet has found new life in the journal Forensic Science International.

Review co-author Dr. William Makis, M.D., announced on X that the formerly censored paper has finally been peer reviewed and is now available for online viewing.

“We found that 73.9% of deaths were directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination,” Makis and his co-authors wrote. “Our data suggest a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccination and death.”

Drs. Peter McCullough, M.D.; Mark Trozzi, M.D.; Richard Amerling; Heather Gessling, M.D.; Harvey Risch; Paul Alexander; and Roger Hodkinson all contributed to the review.

(Related: Did you hear that Meta officially refuted the Canadian study accusing the “Disinformation Dozen” of spreading the most “online anti-vaccine misinformation” during the Wuhan coronavirus [COVID-19] “pandemic?”)

“A victory of science over censorship

Makis was excited to announce the paper’s publishing as its previous rejection from The Lancet threatened to keep its findings from the public.

First author Nicolas Hulscher exhibited “incredible perseverance,” Makis said, by not giving up after The Lancet pulled the paper within the first 24 hours for no legitimate reason, this after hundreds of thousands of people had already downloaded it.

“Big pharma put the squeeze on @TheLancet but has failed to stop us,” Makis added.

Human knowledge is under attack! Governments and powerful corporations are using censorship to wipe out humanity's knowledge base about nutrition, herbs, self-reliance, natural immunity, food production, preparedness and much more. We are preserving human knowledge using AI technology while building the infrastructure of human freedom. Use our decentralized, blockchain-based, uncensorable free speech platform at Brighteon.io. Explore our free, downloadable generative AI tools at Brighteon.AI. Support our efforts to build the infrastructure of human freedom by shopping at HealthRangerStore.com, featuring lab-tested, certified organic, non-GMO foods and nutritional solutions.

“Our paper was delayed by one year, and those actions of censorship and cancellation led to many deaths that could have been prevented. This paper could be a game changer.”

Makis tagged Tucker Carlson, Joe Rogan and Russell Brand in his X announcement in the apparent hope that one or all of them will report on the paper and its findings.

Responding to Makis, the following X user showed what happened to her elderly father after he was tricked into getting shot and boosted for COVID:

This is my dad after a shot and a booster. He’s elderly so he fell for it. We’re devastated ?

Unexplained blisters break out and this last episode landed him in the Atlanta burn center in ICU. Team of specialists can’t identify it. But we all know what it is ?

Healthy all of… pic.twitter.com/tgpOvsxnP0

— ??Salty Texan (@texan_maga) June 22, 2024

Another wrote that two of his relatives died as a result of getting injected, though the two deaths were never officially recognized as having been caused by COVID shots.

“How many died who were never formally reflected in the data?” this same user asked. “Two people in one family who weren’t related is a lot.”

Our readers may also be interested in the following post from “KanekoaTheGreat” (@KanekoaTheGreat) about the spike protein encoding in the injections and how to determine whether or not a death was caused by the shots:

Since the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines only encode for the spike protein, but not the nucleocapsid protein found in natural infection, autopsies utilizing this immune staining method can conclusively determine if inflammatory changes were caused by COVID-19 mRNA vaccines or natural… pic.twitter.com/SsOiQLiIru

— KanekoaTheGreat (@KanekoaTheGreat) March 13, 2023

Dr. Flavio A. Cadegiani, M.D., MSc, Ph.D., also tweeted to Makis that a trial he was part of that was rejected for publishing by the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) “could’ve saved millions” but was instead denied by the journal’s editor-in-chief because he claimed his team did “not have the capacity to analyze the data.”

“It was too good and would have saved too many lives,” Cadegiani wrote about why he believes his trial was rejected by the NEJM. “I have it all documented, so don’t be surprised, my friend.”

Millions of Americans regret getting injected for COVID. Learn more at Vaccines.news.

Sources for this article include:

ScienceDirect.com

Twitter.com

NaturalNews.com